- Information wants to be free. Once data lands on the endpoint, it’s free. There is a much higher likelihood that data will end up in the wrong hands if it’s on an endpoint. Consequently, be careful about what you allow to be stored on the endpoint. Implement policies that restrict data leakage on endpoints and USB devices.
- Code wants to be wrong. No matter how hard developers and engineers try, code always has flaws and bugs that open up vulnerabilities. Frequent and consistent patching is essential to keep your network protected to the highest degree possible.
- Services want to be on. Employees, partners, and customers all want access to your network. Self-service utilities and applications are no doubt a great resource but they can also be the point of vulnerabilities. Frequently test and probe the security capabilities of these types of applications, and regularly look for vulnerabilities and weaknesses that may be exploited by any external or internal user.
- Users want to click. Whenever users see a button, they click on it! Email borne viruses and malicious websites are the source of many viruses and breaches to network security. Educating your end users is an ongoing effort. People forget. They get lazy and have to be reminded about the dangers that lurk on the internet.
- Security features want to be bypassed. Sometimes a security feature can be bypassed (even when enabled) depending upon if the state of a laptop is in standby mode, for example. Always review with your IT staff if any security feature can be bypassed by any means.
Showing posts with label process. Show all posts
Showing posts with label process. Show all posts
Monday, September 20, 2010
Five Irrefutable Laws of Information Security
Apparently these come from the CISO of Intel. Look pretty good to me.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Friday, April 23, 2010
Block, Quarantine or Delete?
Taken from http://www.sophos.com/blogs/chetw/g/2010/04/23/mcafee-fix-dangers-virus-handling
McAfee fix and the dangers of virus handling
from Security Bloggers Network by Chester Wisniewski, Sophos
In the security world the news has been dominated for the last 48 hours with tales of woe regarding the false-positive some McAfee customers encountered with svchost.exe. McAfee customers who have run into the problem can find detailed advice on fixing the issue in McAfee KB68780.
Our emotions regarding malware often lead us astray. Instinctively we want to delete or quarantine malware. McAfee's situation shows why this is a bad idea. According to their KB article if your system experienced this issue your copy of C:\Windows\System32\svchosts.exe has either been quarantined or deleted.
When I was in the Sales Engineering department here at Sophos it seemed to be a full-time job explaining to prospects why it was a bad idea to delete or quarantine viruses and other malware. Why on earth would I want a known malicious file to remain on my PC?
Upon the discovery of malicious code, anti-virus solutions are unable to determine with 100% confidence whether the file in question is required to boot, or required for the regular operation of your PC. As a safety precaution it is best to prevent access to the identified file, but leave it in place and by no means delete it. Viruses often infect critical drivers and other key components of the operating system. If you delete these files upon detection (or even move them) you create a much more difficult recovery process.
Fortunately in this case, McAfee customers are able to boot into Safe Mode and take the actions necessary to restore the computer to a fully working state. There is still a lot of manual work involved, but it does not require you to boot a live CD or USB stick to save the system. In cases where more important files have been moved it can be difficult if not impossible to fix once the files have been tampered with.
My Point? For everyday computers in your workplace the best practice is to attempt to cleanup viruses, but not move them to a central area or delete them permanently. For extremely risk-averse environments and mission critical systems you may wish to be more conservative and simply block access to the file and require a human to take action before making system modifications.
The good news is that false positives are few and far between. Recovery is difficult enough, don't complicate it more than necessary.
Take it from an expert - don't transport malware around your computer/network, clean it up in place, and do your best to do no harm.
McAfee fix and the dangers of virus handling
from Security Bloggers Network by Chester Wisniewski, Sophos
In the security world the news has been dominated for the last 48 hours with tales of woe regarding the false-positive some McAfee customers encountered with svchost.exe. McAfee customers who have run into the problem can find detailed advice on fixing the issue in McAfee KB68780.
Our emotions regarding malware often lead us astray. Instinctively we want to delete or quarantine malware. McAfee's situation shows why this is a bad idea. According to their KB article if your system experienced this issue your copy of C:\Windows\System32\svchosts.exe has either been quarantined or deleted.
When I was in the Sales Engineering department here at Sophos it seemed to be a full-time job explaining to prospects why it was a bad idea to delete or quarantine viruses and other malware. Why on earth would I want a known malicious file to remain on my PC?
Upon the discovery of malicious code, anti-virus solutions are unable to determine with 100% confidence whether the file in question is required to boot, or required for the regular operation of your PC. As a safety precaution it is best to prevent access to the identified file, but leave it in place and by no means delete it. Viruses often infect critical drivers and other key components of the operating system. If you delete these files upon detection (or even move them) you create a much more difficult recovery process.
Fortunately in this case, McAfee customers are able to boot into Safe Mode and take the actions necessary to restore the computer to a fully working state. There is still a lot of manual work involved, but it does not require you to boot a live CD or USB stick to save the system. In cases where more important files have been moved it can be difficult if not impossible to fix once the files have been tampered with.
My Point? For everyday computers in your workplace the best practice is to attempt to cleanup viruses, but not move them to a central area or delete them permanently. For extremely risk-averse environments and mission critical systems you may wish to be more conservative and simply block access to the file and require a human to take action before making system modifications.
The good news is that false positives are few and far between. Recovery is difficult enough, don't complicate it more than necessary.
Take it from an expert - don't transport malware around your computer/network, clean it up in place, and do your best to do no harm.
Labels:
incident response,
procedure,
process,
security,
vulnerability